published on

Daastan (9505428)

Title: Why women criticise sexualised character designs (READ OP)

Reason: User Banned (1 Week): Trolling and antagonizing other members in a thread about gender representation

Rhetorical argument, haha. Do tell as to what does that even mean here. That doesn't mean what you think it means. Thank you for the huge, unintentional compliment. This just goes to show that not only are you oblivious to what I'm saying, but you love using terms for the sake of using them. Whether it was brought up in the thread or not leads to the other argument: you can't expect someone to read 300 pages. Your second paragraph is silly. What am I doing if not talking about the context? "How it relates to the content" ... nice pointless, padding sentences that mean nothing. Do you just want to have the last word, with such a childishly persistent attitude where you've been bringing up random nonsense just to prolong this? God ... you're being so silly!

Link: https://www.resetera.com/posts/9505428/

Archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20180621145556/https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-read-op.4483/page-329

Archive.is (legacy): https://archive.is/NKZLV