published on

StallionDan (1197001)

Title: Why women criticise sexualised character designs (READ OP)

Reason: Members was warned for disingenous posting

Yeah, I just edited back in and bolded the context of the entire post. He didn't talk about the female form, he talked about protection. Also "there is a between their visual design and the actual protection they (would) provide" And what is this disconnect based on? The real world? So argument is realism...

Link: https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-read-op.4483/page-69#post-1197001

Archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20180510212916/https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-read-op.4483/page-69

Archive.is (legacy): https://archive.is/oX0IK