published on

D.A. (1169435)

Title: Why women criticise sexualised character designs (READ OP)

Reason: User warned: trolling, literal objectification

Here's the thing. Women happen to have such bodies, but they're not the only ones with said bodies, there are works of art that share said body type. Statues, dolls, drawings, all manner of art shares possession of said bodies. The female body design is public domain, it belongs to no group. Eventually there will likely be fully functional indistinguishable objects whose sole purpose is to serve and please. Barring legal issues, these objects will share the same human body design used by humans. If I happened to look like a broom, it matters little if I predate the broom. The broom would be an object that just so happens shares my appearance. When people talk of brooms or use brooms, I shouldn't be offended by such.

Link: https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-read-op.4483/page-65#post-1169435

Archive.org: https://web.archive.org/web/20180510212915/https://www.resetera.com/threads/why-women-criticise-sexualised-character-designs-read-op.4483/page-65

Archive.is (legacy): https://archive.is/b9lv4